Latest Updates

Black Tea and your blood sugar - looks look the English have good reason to drink tea

Black Tea and your blood sugar - looks look the English have good reason to drink tea
I've paraphrased the first 3 paragraphs from an article on Dr Mercola's website, which u can read on mercola.com
Looks like the bloody limeys got it right when it came drinking a spot of tea!

Researchers from King's College London and the University of Central Lancashire have found that drinking black tea may be beneficial for people with diabetes, - Who knew?? Looks like the black tea elixir stimulates an insulin response and reduce blood sugar levels. I think I'll go make a cup right now!

Sixteen participants drank glucose in three different forms. Glucose in water, water plus a small amount of caffeine, or water plus instant black tea.

"Two hours later , plasma glucose concentrations were significantly reduced in those who consumed 1 gram of tea, compared to the plain water and caffeine drinks. Drinking black tea also increased insulin levels compared with the other drinks, after 90 minutes.

Tea’s protective benefits have been linked to polyphenols, including:
  • Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)
  • Epigallocatechin
  • Epicatechin gallate
  • Epicatechin
These compounds may offer blood sugar benefits by stimulating B-cells -- pancreatic cells responsible for insulin production -- to produce insulin in your body, according to researchers.

Black tea makes up about 78 percent of the global tea market."

Sources:

And The Winner of The PJs For The Cure Is............

Well, after taking every comment from this past week and assigning it both a day - as in the day the comment was left, and a number - as in what number the comment actually was on said day. And then mixing all those numbers up to pull the said winner out of a hat so to speak - The winner of the Komar PJs For The Cure is........................................





Cara from Every Day, Every Hour, Every Minute!!!

CONGRATS CARA!


Cara, please email me you contact info so I can get those PJs out to you ASAP!!

The next giveaway is on Monday, so be sure to "tune in!"

The Community Workshop for Diabetes Was GREAT!

The Community Workshop for Diabetes Was GREAT!

On Tuesday night I had the opportunity to speak at Community Workshop for Diabetes in Linwood New Jersey in honor of National Diabetes Month.

I spoke to 20 Type 1's and 2's and their counterparts and you know what? We all learned a lot!

First off, I explained that I wasn’t a medical professional, but I was an expert at living life with diabetes. Most in the group were over 60 and they all had lots of questions.

My first question after introducing myself was: What things have you heard about diabetes?

One woman raised her hand and said: I heard eating too much sugar gives you diabetes.

Another insisted that “sugar free” food was better than none-sugar free.

One gentleman raised his hand and said: I don’t have it bad-I’m not on shots.

And then the debunking of the Diabetes Myths began in earnest! You guys know me, so you can bet I had a fun time proving those myths wrong.

We talked in great detail about the different types of diabetes and what they actually meant. Most had no clue what the differences were because no one had ever taken the time to explain the different types to them.

We chatted about small changes equaling big results. Things like learning to read labels and the evils of High Fructose Corn Syrup.

Increasing their exercise routines, even if it’s taking a 10-minute walk twice a day or sitting in a chair and doing exercises with the resistance bands.

I learned that many of the people I was talking with worked very hard to control their diabetes, but that most didn’t know what an Endocrinologist or CDE was and that was frustrating. To me, Endos and CDEs are the diabetes mechanics- we need to see them every 3 months for a tune-up.

I knew something clicked when the Activities Director, who I know and love, (who is T2 and I’m constantly badgering about getting an Endo) raised her hand and said: I’m making an appointment with an Endo Kel- next time I see you, I'll have the answer you want to hear.

When another woman raised her hand and complained about having to watch what she ate, I looked at her and said: I hear you- nobody likes to be told what he or she can’t do. But nobody, diabetic or not, can eat what they want over the age of 30 with out looking like the Pillsbury Dough Boy. It’s about making smart choices. A Certified Diabetes Educator can help you to make smart choices so you can have a cupcake every now and then.

I talked about the Diabetes On-line Community and how it was a great source of both knowledge and comfort, and how even after having the disease for 30 years- It changed my life fantastic ways that I’m still trying to process!

I think the biggest impact the evening was regarding testing blood sugars. Most in the room only tested between 1 and 3 times a day. By the end of the evening 5 people who lived at the assisted living community had committed to adding a 3 pm and bedtime blood sugar for one week- just to see what the results were. That request would be written on their charts, and the staff would make sure that those extra bg tests would be administered. I was proud of them for making that commitment!

But the part of the evening that zinged my heart happened at the end.

After the discussion ended, a tall skinny man who was about 60, and his daughter came up to me. He’d really been active in the workshop and I really appreciated how much he brought to the group.

“Kelly I work so hard to take care of myself. I was diagnosed with Diabetes 24 years ago. I go to an Endo, I eat six small meals a day, but the testing is really giving me a problem as of late, I have Parkinson’s’, and my finger shakes so much that I can barely get the drop of blood onto the test strip – any suggestions?"

I looked at him for a moment and wanted to cry (but kept my game face on) because I really wanted to help him. He’d been so positive and he was working so hard to own his diabetes. Silently, I cursed Parkinson’s for disrupting his life & his life with diabetes.

I thought for a moment and remembered 2 times in my life where testing was really difficult. The first was when my left arm was in a cast and the second was when I sliced my left finger and had 6 stitches and my hand and was in some sort awkward metal splint and bandage contraption. Both injuries made testing cumbersome. It’s ironic that even though I’m left handed, I actually favor testing on my left hand instead of my right.

Anyway, I could get the blood out of most of my fingers, but the cast and or splint were bulky and I’d never quite make a clean sweep to the meter. I’d found comfort in testing in a backwards sort of way.

I looked at him and said: Well… instead of bringing your finger to your meter to test like you usually do, why not try bringing your meter to your finger instead? Your meter is bigger and easier for you to manipulate than a little test strip."

He looked at me, smiled, and said: You know what, I’ve asked so many people about this; my Dr's, the woman who does my monthly blood work, and no one ever suggested that before. It makes sense and I can’t wait to try it! THANK YOU SO MUCH.

I looked at him, smiled back and said: Your welcome-I'm so glad I could help! Your Endo is an expert at Diabetes, but patients are experts at living with diabetes. We know all sorts of tricks of the Diabetes trade because we live with it 24X7.

2nd Post up on the Diabetes O.C. - and it "POPS"

2nd Post up on the Diabetes O.C. - and it "POPS"
So my second post is up on the Diabetes OC - and dare I say it's got a bit of a "POP" to it! ;)
Guys, let me know what you think.

Patient Choice. To take the medication? Or not?

Patient Choice. To take the medication? Or not?
Increasingly people are becoming aware that ConMed drugs are dangerous. So what do you do when your GP says you should take them? The first response should be to do some research, and ask a couple of important questions.

* What are the side-effects of the drug? And think of them not so much as side-effects, but 'disease-inducing-effects' (DIEs)?
* Are there alternative ways of treating my illness that are safer, and more effective?

This is what JT did recently, following a comment I made on Facebook about Statin drugs. This is what she wrote to me.

My husband was prescribed (Statins) a year ago. On reading up on the side effects he decided not to bother and he just spent 20 mins on the phone yesterday trying to convince the doctor that he was wasting his time trying to punt them - conversation went something like this:

Doctor "We're very worried about your cholesterol levels"

Husband "I'm very worried about your statins!"

Doctor "We have a range of different types you can try!"

Husband "If it's a choice between statins and cholesterol I'll keep the cholesterol, thanks!"... so proud of him! But we are going to cut out the dumplings etc as well!


JT's husband has therefore made a personal choice, an informed choice, an important choice for himself, and for his future health. He has decided to deal with his cholesterol problem through diet; and there is plenty of evidence that this approach is more effective, and certainly safer, than filling the coffers of Big Pharma by taking their drugs.


If we all want safer medical treatment, more of us are going to have to start saying  'No' to anyone, including GP's, who want us to take drugs, without telling us about their DIEs.


Narcolepsy and flu vaccine: drugs may harm us: but Big Pharma takes no responsibility

Narcolepsy and flu vaccine: drugs may harm us: but Big Pharma takes no responsibility
Narcolepsy is a serious medical condition that causes excessive drowsiness, falling asleep at inappropriate times, and serious disruption to sleep patterns, and lifestyle. At its worst in can become cataplexy, which effects muscle control, and often the total loss of muscle control.

It has hitherto been a rare condition; but it is due to increase as it comes to us as a result of accepting the flu vaccine.

Who says? The government, who in September 2013 admitted that evidence from the Health Protection Agency has confirmed that the Swine Flu vaccine, Pandemrix, can cause the disease. NHS Choices have not come to terms with this yet as when it outlines the causes of Narcolepsy it fails to mention the flu vaccine! And, of course, our Big Pharma compliant media has not bothered to draw attention to the fact either!

This is yet another example of pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines causing disease: not illness, not adverse reactions, not side-effects: but actual, long-term disease. What I have called the DIEs, or the Disease Inducing Effects of conventional medicine.

So, having given us the disease, what is the NHS going to do about the condition? Not very much, it would seem.

"There is no specific cure for narcolepsy, but you can manage your symptoms to minimise the impact the condition has on your daily life". NHS Choices.

This is yet another example of the Conventional Medical Establishment 'successfully' causing a disease - but can then do nothing about it!

Now, again unreported by the media, 38 people in Britain have begun a class legal claim against GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), the manufacturer of Pandemrix. If successful, the lawyers representing the group believe each of the claimant, if successful, could receive about £1 million in compensation.

Good for patients? Bad for GSK?

Well, no, not really. If GSK lose the case it is the government, through the NHS, that will have to pay up. This is the result of an 'indemnity agreement' between GSK and the Department of Health which means, in effect, that any compensation claims resulting from the vaccine, or any legal costs arising from the court case, must be paid by the government.

So what does this mean for patients, for the taxpayer, and for the conventional medical establishment?

For those patients who now suffer from Narcolepsy in means:

  • they were persuaded to accept a vaccine because of a health scare, generated by the conventional medical establishment, that never happened;
  • that whereas they were perfectly healthy prior to the vaccine, they are now suffering, probably for the rest of their lives, with a life-changing and debilitating disease;
  • that the NHS has no treatment that can help them.

For the taxpayer, it means that:

  • we have had to pay for a dangerous vaccine for an epidemic that did not happen;
  • we will have to pay for the treatment (however ineffective) of patients who have been given the disease;
  • we will have to pay any court costs arising from the class action;
  • we will have to pay for any compensation awarded by the courts.
For the drug company, and the Conventional Medical Establishment, it means that:
  • they successfully convinced us about an epidemic swine flu crisis that never happened, a crisis that was designed to scare us into accepting the vaccine, on their advice;
  • they (GSK) will pocket from the profit made by selling the NHS a vaccine that was not needed, and which has now been admitted caused serious disease;
  • they (GSK) will not have to suffer any financial or legal consequences for giving us yet another harmful and dangerous vaccine;
  • they will not have to experience any adverse publicity as our mainstream media is unwilling to tell the public about what is happening with conventional drugs and vaccines

The Pharmaceutical business is clearly a good one to be in! It may be causing havoc to our health. But we, as taxpayers, continue to pay for their drugs and vaccines. Governments are prepared to give drug companies immunity for any harm or damage they may cause. And our Media are not prepared to publish any information that suggests the conventional medical establishment is imposing on us a form of medicine that is unsafe, ineffective, hugely expensive - and damaging the health of patients.