Latest Updates

Asthma and Homeopathy

Asthma and Homeopathy
Hpathy.com, has recently published an article on Asthma and Homeopathy. I read through it, and thought the selection of remedies, the the descriptions of the remedies and their uses, was good, and having read it,I decided to check who had written it.

The piece was written in 1885! Over 125 years ago!

What this demonstrates is that homeopathy is a very stable form of medicine. It does not change, year in, year out, like ConMed. It does not need to. Homeopathic remedies are safe, and once we know what kind of conditions they treat, they are effective, and remain effective. And if they were safe and effective in 1885, they are safe today.

So I thought that I would reproduce the piece below, for your information. Thanks to Hpathy.com for publishing this historical document - and demonstrating how timeless homeopathy is.


"The remedies for asthma must be considered in regard to their adaptability to the spasm and to the interval. Resort will be had to various methods and substances by the patient himself, in order to relieve the severity of the attack, and if anything has been found by experience to afford any relief in former fits, it is best to acquiesce in its continuance.

Remedies for the Attack
The chief remedies are: Aconite, Arsenicum, Bryonia, Ipecacuanha, Lobelia, Sambucus, Cuprum and Hydrocyanic acid.
Aconite — When the attack has been induced by cold, dry air, or subjection to a foggy atmosphere.
Arsenicum — For nightly paroxysms, with great restlessness and anxiety, and burning pains in the chest. There is perspiration of the whole body, with alternate hot and cold sensations, and prostration.
Bryonia — In addition to the symptoms of the spasm, there is some bronchitis, sharp pains around the chest, much worse by deep inspiration and by motion.
Ipecacuahna — This is the remedy used most frequently, and is recommended by all schools. The dyspnoea is very considerable, there is constriction of the throat and chest. The cough is constant, with rattling of mucus, nausea, and vomiting. The surface is cold and damp, and the face pale. The remedy is given when there is no immediate assignable cause for the attack.
Lobelia — is indicated for a paroxysm induced by gastric trouble. There is immense development of gas in the stomach, and little or no cough. The attack is often preceded by a prickling sensation all over.
Sambucus — Is of service when the degree of dyspnea is beyond that witnessed under Ipecacuanha, and the cough is less. The patient evidences extreme anxiety, the face becomes violet in hue, and asphyxia seems imminent. Loud sibilant rales accompany the dyspnoea. Sambucus is usually employed in the tincture.
Cuprum — Is especially useful in the purely nervous variety of asthma. Its onset is sudden, the respiration is very spasmodic, is complicated with cramps and convulsive twitchings, and terminates suddenly. The attack may occur in conjunction with the menstrual epoch, or in consequence of emotional excitement.
Hydrocyanic acid — Is recommended by Hughes for the class of cases which suggest Cuprum. He uses it in recent and uncomplicated asthma, when there is difficult and spasmodic respiration, with contraction of the throat, and feelings of suffocation.

Remedies for the Interval
Arsenicum, Nuz vomica, Sulphur, Pulsatilla, Antimonium tart, Iodine, and Aurum.
Arsenicum — When this remedy is called into requisition for the paroxysm, it is frequently found to relieve also the habitual, wheezy, dyspnoeic state. The idications are : precordial anxiety, with exacerbations at night ; cough, accompanied by the expectoration of a transparent, frothy, viscid fluid. When chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or cardiac disease complicates the case Arsenic is often of service. It is also to be kept prominently in mind when the asthma is a neurosis, probably alternating with some other nervous disorder, as well as when it depends on a suppressed eruption.
Nux Vomica — For irritable persons who are accustomed to drinking coffee or liquor. After the subsidence of an attack the tongue exhibits a thick yellow coating. There is a feeling of fullness in the stomach, with belching, and constipation. As Dr. Bussell says of it, there remains a sort of physical memory of the struggle, and the patient feels that no liberties must be taken, either of diet or exercise. If the attack began with sneezing and fluent coryza, or if vapors of copper or arsenic started it, or if it is merely spasmodic, in consequence of a hypersensitive pneumogastric, Nux and Strychnia are most useful remedies.
Sulphur — This remedy stands well in the treatment of asthma when skin affections alternate with the dyspnoea, but it is even a more powerful agent in the complication of the asthmatic with the gouty constitution. The attack is marked by sibilant dyspnoea, bluish lips, and it recurs once a week, usually in the night.
Pulsatilla — For a case of asthma ill-defined in its onset; with an abundant catarrhal expectoration, vertigo, vomiting, prostration, and palpitation of the heart . It may have been due to deranged menstruation, hysteria, uremic poisoning, or a suppressed rash.
Antimonium tart — This has great abundance of secretions, with rattling of mucus, and difficult expiration. It is specially recommended for old people and young children.
Iodine — In the form of Potassium iodide (Kali iodatum) this remedy is in much favor among some old school practitioners, and Baehr points out its well-marked homeopathicity by its effects when taken for a protracted period. The attack usually starts about midnight, lasts half an hour, and is succeeded by lassitude and an irresistible desire to sleep. The patient is nervous and restless during the interval, and the asthma appears to be entirely of the spasmodic variety.
Aurum — For morning asthma, with bluish face and great palpitation of the heart ; suffocative attacks, with spasmodic constriction of the chest The accompanying symptoms are of involvement of the heart and pulmonary congestion.

Other useful remedies in the treatment of asthma are :
Belladonna — When the attack comes on in the afternoon or evening, with congestion of the face and head ; worse in hot, damp weather.
Cannabis — Is of use only in massive doses, and after thus using it once, may prove to be entirely ineffective in subsequent attacks. Its action is narcotic, and hence palliative. Given in the first attenuation it is said to be serviceable in humid asthma.
Chamomilla— For children during dentition, and often for hysteric asthma, especially if induced by anger, and accompanied with flatulence.
Carbo veg— For old and feeble people whose attacks come on after midnight, and so severe that they seem to be dying. There is distension with wind and inability to raise it.
Digitaline — For a purely nervous asthma, without accompanying lesions of the lungs, heart, or bronchi. The paroxysms are frequent and ol comparatively short duration. Digitalis is a palliative even when right ventricle dilatation coexists. The attack is preceded by palpitations, and there is marked venous congestion of the head during the spasm, followed by violent headache. It is also useful in men debilitated by sexual excesses.
Kali bichromicum is recommended in humid asthma, when the signs of mucus in the bronchial tubes exceed the amount actually present. The gastric mucous membrane is simultaneously affected.
Moschus — For asthma in people of a nervous, irritable, or hypochondriac disposition. There is a violent feeling of constriction in the throat, without cough.
Opium or Morphine in a low attenuation, will often give great relief without inducing narcotism. The respirations are slow and labored, the face is cyanotic, the sensorium depressed, and cough constant.
Pulmo Vulpis – Von Grauvogl used a first centesimal trituration of this as a remedy in an old subject suffering with asthma humidum, and met with brilliant success.
Sanguinaria is recommended in hay asthma and in post-climacteric asthma.
In the latter instance Dr. Ludlam gives it upon the following indications : severe dyspnoea, teasing, hacking cough, dryness in the throat, and an inclination to take a deep inspiration during the paroxysm.
Spongia has rendered some service in asthma due to phthisis, by mitigating the severity of the attacks. The spasm is marked by complete loss of voice, wheezing respiration, and contraction of the glottis.
Stannum, Plumbum, Zincum, Ferrum, Argentum have all been accorded a place among the remedies for asthma, but their indications are not always well defined, nor are they clinically proved to be reliable.
The following remedies may be consulted, as possibly indicated :
Apis, Asafoetida, Bovista, Bromium, Calcarea carb., Causticum, Cistus, Cocculus, Colchimm,Gelsemium, Graphites, Grindela, Hepar, Hypericum, Kali carb., Lachesis, Lactuca vir., Lycopodium, Mephitis, Natrum sulph, Nitric acid, Nux moschata, Phosphorus, Sabadilla, Salicylic acid, Sepia, Silicea, Staphysagria, Sticta, Thuja, Veratrum.

Article by A. K. Crawford MD – From: A System of Medicine Based Upon the Law of Homeopathy Ed. H. R. Arndt, M.D. Vol 1,1885.

Mums, Pregnancy and Homeopathy

Mums, Pregnancy and Homeopathy
One of the main reasons for families starting to use homeopathy is during pregnancy. Conventional  Medical drugs have been consistently damaging pregnant women since Thalidomide, and they continue to do so. Big Pharma don't appear to give a damn, and sadly, GPs continue to prescribe drugs either in ignorance that they can do harm, or not bothering to find out.

As WDDTY have said recently, there is no such thing as a safe drug for a pregnant woman, and virtually every prescription drug could cause birth defects. Yet as they go on to say, doctors are prescribing an ever-increasing number of drugs to women, often ignoring official warnings. This is according to a recently published survey that discovered many women were taking up to 4 different drugs. The survey found that 80% of pregnant women were taking some form of drug, an increase of 60% over the past 30 years.

Clearly, the drug companies, GPs, and the entire Conventional Health Establishment has learnt little since Thalidomide!

The study was done by researchers from Boston University Stone Epidemiology Centre, after reviewing a survey of 30,000 women. (Source: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011; doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.029).


The WDDTY feature is at 
http://www.wddty.com/doctors-giving-drugs-to-half-of-all-pregnant-women-despite-the-warnings.html
and it is interesting to see their previous articles on this subject. They include articles on antibiotics causing birth defects, Prozac babies have birth defects, Antidepressant drugs cause birth defects, Fertility drugs and birth defects. And one that comes to this conclusion:


"Women who are very young or pregnant are two population groups who should almost never be prescribed general pharmaceuticals.

WDDTY are doing a great service in warning us all about the dangers of pharmaceutical drugs at this critical time. But rather than worrying, mums should relax, and get in touch with a local homeopath to make sure she has safe treatment available to her should she need medical treatment.

D Blog Week, Day Two: Dear Diabetes Guilt


Diabetes guilt isn't type specific. Type 1, type 1.5, type 2, or type 3,we've all experienced it ~

Assignment number two for Diabetes blog week was to write a letter to your diabetes, or a person, place, thing associated with your diabetes. SO glad Karen picked this as a topic! I'm a HUGE fan of writing a letter to my diabetes, and even have a " Dear Diabetes" label on my blog that currently has close to 4 dozen letters.

I find writing a personal letter to or about diabetes incredibly cathartic, healing, and down right cool and I HIGHLY suggest you try it if you haven't already!

The following letter: Dear Diabetes Guilt, was original posted on October 27th, 2009, after a discussion I participated in about guilt and chronic illness on twitter.

I was all set to write a new letter last week, but after noticing lots of blogs from type 1s, 1.5s, type 2s and type 3s regarding the subject of diabetes guilt, I felt that it was appropriate to repost this one.

And it's my hope that you take something positive away from it~

#########

Dear Diabetes Guilt:

You’ve been with me and by my side almost daily since my diagnoses.

I first experienced you when I looked into my parents’ eyes when I was diagnosed and saw the sadness that was looking back at me. I was child number 6, diabetic child number 3.

My diagnoses hurt my parents so much. All I could say was “I’m sorry”- and then I did my best to make them laugh.

The guilt was next me as I snuck Christmas Cookies from the freezer and blamed the cookies disappearance on my sister- child number 3, diabetic child number 2.

Diabetes, your guilt made a 10 year old little girl run laps around the block to burn off contraband Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups.

You were next to me as I'd steal cookies from my friends kitchen and eat them in the bathroom so no one would see.

Diabetes guilt (and the look of disappointment and fear in my parents eyes) made me lie to them regarding my urine testing and blood sugar results.

It wasn’t the high numbers I was afraid of- it was making my parents sad, scared and angry that made my 11-year-old self fudge my numbers.

I'd cry when my Endo told me I wasn't trying hard enough. I was 13 and doing my best.

Wanting a few cookies every now and then shouldn't have equated a trip to confession and 13 "Hail Mary's".

In high school you mocked me to be part of the crowd - but I couldn't ignore diabetes.

Between the hell that was high school and being a PWD, it was a long 4 years.

In college I felt your guilt daily. I wanted too fit in and be “normal, ” and having diabetes was a foreign routine on campus.

I used my humor to win friends and they accepted both diabetes and me, as is.

I flourished with friends and success.

Your guilt didn’t just affect me-It damaged my family as a whole.

Your guilt cursed my sister- She strived for normalcy – which eluded her because back in the diabetes dark ages, normal was never an option.

I felt diabetes guilt because my sister with diabetes was dying and I was angry with both her and the world.

I didn’t understand how sick she was or how much the guilt of diabetes drove her down a self-destructive path.

I just knew she was sick and that I spent so many of much of my high school and college years taking care of her with my parents.

I didn’t understand and I hate to admit now, but I blamed her for not taking better care of herself.

I was a kid, she was 14 years older than me, and I didn’t understand what a restrictive world she and her diabetes were brought up in until I was well into adulthood.

If my other sister (child number 1, diabetic number 1) could live good life and have three healthy sons, why couldn't she?

I felt diabetes guilt for not always understanding, and for always being fearful that it could have been me.

I wanted to be a full time college student. Not a full time college student who was a PWD and a caretaker as well.

Even thought we fought as only siblings can, I never thought that diabetes complications would actually kill her.

I felt guilt for not having patience and for not always being kind.

My diabetes guilt stood beside me as I gave her eulogy.

I felt your guilt whenever people spoke of how much my sister suffered.

I felt your guilt whenever I got my own test results back.

I felt your guilt in my mid twenties when I was scared into becoming a good patient.

In my mid twenties and early thirties I worked hard on my diabetes management and had the numbers to prove it.

My Dr. went so far as to call me a model patient.

But still, your guilty presence made me want to apologize all the time- even when I was doing nothing wrong.

When I contemplated a cupcake, I felt guilty. Even when I tested, counted carbs, and bolused accordingly.

I apologized whenever my numbers would go up or down for no apparent reason.

I became defensive whenever a friend would ask: Kel, should you eat that?

I’d feel guilty that I don’t excise enough and I’d feel guilty when I exercised to much and would run low because I’d miscalculated my temporary basal rate.

Over the past 15 years I’ve learned to only concentrate on one number at a time.

I owe that attitude (in part) to you.

Because I became so tired of having you as a companion and a partner in my diabetes management.

So I’ve learned (and am still learning every day) to let go of you.

I accept that you exist and I will admit that you’ve done some good.

But I grew so tired of having you as the anchor I wear around my neck.

So, I removed you from my world on a daily basis - and while you still make your presence known from time to time, I no longer say I’m sorry for being a human with Diabetes.

I've lifted your anchor of guilt, hitched up my sails in the wind, and let my diabetes flag fly!

I have my good numbers and my bad.

I have great test results, and some not so great ones from time to time.

But I always try, and try again.

When I fall off the diabetes wagon, I get up and get back on.

Instead of anchoring on to the guilt, I use those numbers and results as a GPS in my diabetes management.

I take it one number at a time and I always do my best.

I own my diabetes, diabetes doesn't own me.

I’m still sorry that diabetes exists in the world.

But I am no longer sorry for being a person with Diabetes.

A Typical Day In Living A Life With Diabetes???

A Typical Day In Living A Life With Diabetes???
"A Typical Day in The Life With Diabetes" was the first assignment for Diabetes Blog Week.

Hmmm, not as easy as it sounds. Diabetes is never the same disease two days in row. What works for me on Monday, might not work for me on Tuesday, even if my blood sugar numbers and activities are similar.

Life with the Big D is a balancing act requiring us to precariously balance blood sugar numbers - both high and low, carbs, ratios, activities, doorknobs attracting pump tubing, the occasional appearance of ketones, and the every so sneaky attack known as Murphy's Law.

I've written the analogy before, life with diabetes is a circus of sorts, a theater of both the absurd and required. And like all good theater, every performance is slightly different.

A typical day requires me to jump through diabetes hoops and be flexible and diligent at the same time.
And every day, typical or not, requires me to test my blood sugars, over and over, and over and over, and over and over, and over and over and over and over, and over and over, and over and over again.

A typical day requires me to triple check my work bag to make sure I have back ups of everything. And by everything I mean; pump supplies, test strips, lancets- OK, who am I kidding? I may bring back up lancets, but I rarely use them. Back to the check list, extra insulin, two Lara bars, pump batteries, and a penny- not for luck, but to unscrew the lid on my pump so I can replace the battery.

On any given day, I know that when I least expect it I'll run into a Cappo in the Diabetes Police who will lecture me (for my own good of course,) on Diabetes management, etiquette, and the likes there of - and will most certainly get it wrong. I prep myself to keep my cool, except of course, when I throw caution to the wind and my "cool" out the window and rip said Diabetes Police a new one!

And lastly, I prepare myself on a daily basis to expect both the expected and the unexpected- and roll with it. Because by rolling with the diabetes tide instead of against it, I not only keep what little sanity I have left, but end up with the diabetes upper hand....at least for the moment at hand~

Asthma at epidemic levels - is it caused by pharmaceutical drugs?

Asthma at epidemic levels - is it caused by pharmaceutical drugs?

Asthma affects breathing. When an asthma sufferer comes into contact with an allergen it triggers an irritation in the airways. The muscles around the walls of the airways (the small tubes that carry air in and out of the lungs) get tighter, the linings becomes inflamed, and so become narrower. Sometimes sticky mucus or phlegm can further narrow the airways. As this happens it make it difficult to breath and leading to symptoms of asthma.
  • In 2000, GP's in the UK saw over 18,000 cases relating to new asthma attacks each week.
  • The number of new cases of asthma each year is now 3 to 4 times higher in adults and 6 times higher in children than it was 25 years ago.
  • Of 56 countries surveyed, the UK has the fifth highest prevalence rate (20.7%) for asthma in 13 to 14 year olds.
  • Asthma attacks now cost the UK an estimated £1.2 billion in lost productivity, £850 million in NHS treatment and a further £161 million in social security costs.
  • Over 18 million working days are lost to asthma each year

  • 5.2 million people in the UK are currently receiving treatment for asthma: this includes 1.1 million children (1 in 10 children) and 4.1 million adults (1 in 12 adults).
  • There is a person with asthma in one in five households in the UK.
  • There were 1,381 deaths from asthma in the UK in 2004 (40 were children aged 14 years or under). On average, 4 people per day or 1 person every 6 hours dies from asthma.
  • An estimated 75% of hospital admissions for asthma are avoidable and as many as 90% of the deaths from asthma are preventable.
  • 42% of people with asthma say that traffic fumes stop them walking and shopping in congested areas
  • 40% of people with asthma avoid smoky pubs and restaurants
  • 56% of people with asthma are sensitive to pet allergens

So Asthma is yet another disease that has reached epidemic proportions during the 20th century - the century during which ConMed, and its drugs and vaccines, have become dominant.
The drug Acetaminophen, a pain killer and fever reducer found in the common painkiller, Paracetomol (Tylenol in the USA), and many other over-the-counter drugs, have now been linked to asthma. Natural News reported on 24th November 2009 that Canadian researchers at the University of British Columbia conducted a detailed analysis of 19 clinical studies, involving 425,140 people, that linked asthma to this drug. The found that the drug significantly raised the odds of having asthma (and remember, this drug is used in Paracetomol.
"The analysis specifically showed a worrisome risk of asthma in children who had been given acetaminophen in the year prior to their asthma diagnosis, or in the first year of life".
So, another major modern disease is known to be caused by one of the commonest painkilling drugs used in conventional medicine.
It is also accepted, by the drug manufacturers, that the universal DPT vaccine causes ‘respiratory track infections’, and ‘difficulty breathing’. So this vaccine, given routinely to all babies from about 3 months old, may also be implicated. The connection is confirmed in the following links”
So what about the connection between asthma and antibiotics? This webpage discusses the connection. And this webpage, from the Asthma Foundation, makes reference to 21 studies that have made the connection, although it seems to be mainly concerned with dismissing the evidence, although it concluded that a ‘causal relationship’ could not be dismissed.
So it is quite possible that a drug, antibiotics, used to treat asthma is actually causing asthma! It would seem that our drug companies profit from illness in many interconnect ways!

The Health Debate (4). The cost-effectiveness of Big Pharma drugs

The Health Debate (4). The cost-effectiveness of Big Pharma drugs
The cost of ConMed treatment is exorbitant, and always has been. Given its ineffectiveness, and also its inherent dangers, the issue of cost-effectiveness should now be considered. We have a National Health Service (NHS) that has cost us in excess of £110 billion in recent years. From its inauguration in 1947, costs have risen year-by-year - usually alongside claims that the service is 'under-funded'.

We also have a situation where the numbers of people suffering from chronic diseases, like Arthritis, Cancers of all types, Dementia, Depression, Autism, and disease linked to heart, kidneys, liver, have all increased, often exponentially.

We suffer chronic disease now at epidemic levels. Why? Why is it not discussed?

If we then consider (just) the known, and admitted side-effects, adverse reactions, and disease-inducing effects (DIEs) of Big Pharma drugs, the link between increased expenditure on conventional medical (ConMed) treatment (largely drug based) and increasing costs becomes clear.

But, of course, this essential feature of the 'health debate' is rarely discussed by the mainstream Media. Nor is the performance of ConMed ever compared with other medical therapies, like homeopathy.

Why is this? And what kind of questions should the Media be asking if it had any intention of entering into "the Health Debate"? Perhaps these are just of few of them!
  • Why does the Media not ask searching questions about why Big Pharma drugs are so excessively expensive?
  • Why does the Media not focus on either or both side of the 'cost-effectiveness' question when it comes to ConMed drugs?
  • Why does the Media not ask questions about the link between increasing NHS expenditure, especially on Big Pharma drugs, and the rising levels of chronic disease?
  • Why has the NHS conducted so few comparative studies on the cost-effectiveness of ConMed, Homeopathy, and other CAM therapies?
  • Why are NHS resources spent almost totally on one medical discipline, ConMed? Why does the NHS not spend more money on Homeopathy, and other CAM therapies?
  • Why, despite massive annual increases in NHS spending in recent years, are ConMed health services still overstretched, and often, apparently, quite unable to cope with the demands of ill-health and disease?
When HRT (hormone replacement therapy) was found to cause breast cancer in 2002 (it was actually known to do so many, many years before that), prescriptions for the drug (once said to be a wonder drug, and entirely safe) was reduced massively. There followed, over the next few years, a major reduction in new breast cancer cases in the UK. Of course, the mainstream Media has barely mentioned this (and has since allowed the ConMed Establishment to claim that this reduction in breast cancer is part of its successful campaign against the disease). 


What this means, of course, is that ConMed treatment is not only expensive, in its own right, but it is expensive in that it creates other diseases, and treatment is then required for the new diseases! The pharmaceutical companies have developed a marvellous business structure! Their drugs treat disease; cause more disease; and so they then profit again from treating the new, iatrogenic, diseases.

The cost of some Big Pharma drugs is quite amazing. Several years ago there was a debate about the drug Herceptin, and whether it should be available, free of charge, on the NHS. Herceptin was said at the time to cost some £30,000 per person per year, and was designed to treat women with breast cancer. Many of these women, of course, would have been those who developed breast cancer as a result of taking HRT! The mainstream Media did not point at this time, either that the campaign for Herceptin was funded by the drug manufacturer; or that the drug had been known, for some years, to cause heart problems, and death. And so it continues

For the drug companies it is a profitable business. 

For many patients it is a personal disaster.

For the NHS, and the British taxpayer, it is a spiralling, out of control, bottomless pit.

The fifth part of this series will focus on the epidemic levels of chronic disease that we are now experiencing, and why burgeoning expenditure on ConMed treatments has not been able to cope with these epidemics.

If you would like to be informed when the fifth part of this series is published, why not become a 'follower', and sign up for this blog; or subscribe to it by email - and join the Health Debate.

Dementia / Alzheimer's Disease. Caused by conventional medical drugs?

Dementia / Alzheimer's Disease. Caused by conventional medical drugs?

Alzheimer’s disease is the commonest of over 100 forms of dementia, a brain disorder that seriously and progressively restricts the ability to carry out normal daily functions and activities. It affects the parts of the brain that control thought, memory, and language. Alzheimer’s disease was first noted by Dr. Alois Alzheimer, a German doctor in about 1906, when it must have been an extremely rare condition.
The incidence of Alzheimer’s, and dementia generally, has increased rapidly over the last 50 to 60 years. A report published in 2006 by the Alzheimer's Disease International (ADI), mentioned in The Lancet (17th December 2005), calculated that there was a new case of dementia every seven seconds, and predicted that, worldwide, dementia cases are expected to double every 20 years. They estimated that over 24 million people are living with dementia, and 4.6 million new cases are diagnosed each year. There are 4.8 million in Western Europe and 3.4 million in North America. The ADI chairman is reported as calling the situation "a ticking time bomb".
The Alzheimer's Society published a major study on the social and economic impact of dementia in the UK in February 2007. The research, was undertaken by King's College London, and the London School of Economics, provided the most detailed information about the prevalence and impact of dementia in the UK. These are some of its findings http://www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.php?documentID=342
  • There are currently 700,000 people with dementia in the UK.
  • There are currently 15,000 younger people with dementia in the UK (considered to be an under-estimate by about 3-times as data relies on referrals to services).
  • There are over 11,500 people with dementia from black and minority ethnic groups in the UK.
  • There will be over a million people with dementia by 2025.
  • Two thirds of people with dementia are women.
  • The proportion of people with dementia doubles for every 5 year age group. One third of people over 95 have dementia.
  • 60,000 deaths a year are directly attributable to dementia.
  • The financial cost of dementia to the UK is over £17 billion a year.
  • Family carers of people with dementia save the UK over £6 billion a year.
  • 64% of people living in care homes have a form of dementia.
  • Two thirds of people with dementia live in the community while one third live in a care home.

The cause of this epidemic, like so many others, is said to be ‘unknown’. One of the main excuses for the rapid rise of dementia in recent decades has been that ‘people are living longer’, and that it is ‘a normal part of ageing’.. But this is no longer viable as younger people, some in their 30’s, are now developing the condition. More realistic causes may be an increased contact with metals like aluminium and mercury (including dental amalgam, a mercury based compound placed routinely in our teeth, in a wet environment that leeches this poison into our bodies, close to our brain). Both metals can be found in vaccines.
Yet this is certainly an epidemic that could have been caused by the increased consumption of ConMed drugs during the last 60-100 years. The rise in drug taking is reflected in the rise of dementia, and the global incidence of dementia reflects the amount of drugs consumed by different countries.
The connection is, of course, not recognised by the Conventional Medical Establishment, although any cursory examination of the British National Formulary demonstrates that there are a large number of Big Pharma drugs that list 'confusion' as a 'side-effect'. But there is evidence to connect dementia with drugs, as the two examples here indicate.
Dr Hugh Fudenberg, MD, one of the world's leading immuno-geneticists, has said that if an individual has had 5 consecutive ‘flu vaccinations between 1970 and 1980 (the years he studied) his/her chances of getting Alzheimer's Disease was 10 times higher than if he/she had one, 2 or no shots. Dr. Fudenberg said that this was due to the mercury and aluminum elements in ‘flu vaccinations, and that the gradual mercury and aluminum build-up in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction. (Hugh Fudenberg, MD, is Founder and Director of Research, Neuro lmmuno Therapeutic Research Foundation, and this information came from transcribed notes of his speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September, 1997).
There is also evidence that common drugs used to treat depression, Parkinson’s disease and allergies can produce symptoms that can be mistaken for early dementia. An article in the British Medical Journal (Feb 2006; 332: 455 – 459) refers to research says doctors should be aware anticholinergic drugs can cause confusion, memory loss and disorientation. Karen Ritchie, the author of the article, told Reuters (London) that
"A large number of elderly people are taking medications that can mimic early dementia and are likely to be classed as having early dementia. A very large number of people with so-called early dementia have these effects due to drug consumption. The drugs they are taking are very common - they include things like antihistamines"
"What we showed is that many of the people who are classified in this way have it due to the medication they are taking, and not because they have early Alzheimer's disease".
"The drugs they are taking are very common they include things like antihistamines"
Anticholinergic drugs are prescribed to relieve tremors, muscle stiffness, weakness, anxiety, incontinence and sleep problems – so contracting Alzheimer’s disease as a result of taking them should perhaps be described as something more serious than a ‘side-effect’! In Chapter 5 of my e-book, The Failure of Conventional Medicine, I have developed the alternative concept of DIEs (or Disease Inducing Effects) for drugs that contribute to diseases far worse than the illness for which they were originally intended.
The self-published book by Grace E Jackson, called ‘Drug Induced Dementia - a perfect crime’ takes us through, and catalogues, the vast amount of scientific evidence that conventional medical drugs are the primary cause of all forms of dementia, which has certain become one of the more rampant epidemic conditions of our time. 
There are many other links to articles associating dementia and Alzeiimer’s Disease with conventional pharmaceutical drugs:
Certainly, anyone who has a relative or friend who has dementia, particularly in the early stages, it would be wise to look at this potential cause of dementia.